Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2026

Protected Conversations: What Employers Need To Know

Blacks
Blacks
Contributor
Blacks

Blacks

At Blacks, our clients inspire us. Their ambition, resilience, and success drive us to deliver...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blacks

Section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 allows employers and employees to have confidential “pre-termination negotiations”, commonly known as “protected conversations”. They are designed to enable the parties to explore agreed exit terms without those discussions being used as evidence in an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

What is a protected conversation under section 111A?

Section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 allows employers and employees to have confidential “pre-termination negotiations”, commonly known as “protected conversations”. They are designed to enable the parties to explore agreed exit terms without those discussions being used as evidence in an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. Unlike the common law “without prejudice” rule, section 111A does not require a pre-existing dispute. However, the protection is limited and should not be treated as a blanket shield for every claim or every aspect of the discussions.

What does the Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd ruling mean for employers?

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) in Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd provides important clarification on two areas that employers should understand before starting a protected conversation: the scope of section 111A protection, and how “improper behaviour” is assessed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from