Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2021

Gearing Up For Change?

A Supreme Court ruling brought a four-year battle with Uber to an end by determining that drivers are not self-employed, but workers. Lloyd Davey and Emily Hocken examine the wider implications of the judgment.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

A Supreme Court ruling brought a four-year battle with Uber to an end by determining that drivers are not self-employed, but workers. Lloyd Davey and Emily Hocken examine the wider implications of the judgment.

Uber and its drivers were not the only ones eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court's judgment in Uber BV and Others v Aslam and others, handed down last month. The finding that Uber drivers are workers, as opposed to independent contractors, and as such are entitled to a range of valuable protections including national minimum wage and holiday pay, is likely to have national and potentially global impact, forcing businesses operating within the gig economy to reconsider their business models.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from