Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JUNE 2007

Engineer´s Responsibility For Temporary Works

An engineer engaged to provide design services for permanent works may also owe a duty to his employer for temporary works, even if the employer's brief does not specifically refer to temporary works.

United KingdomEmployment and HR
Tim Kernutt
Tim Kernutt
Julian Bailey
Julian Bailey

An engineer engaged to provide design services for permanent works may also owe a duty to his employer for temporary works, even if the employer's brief does not specifically refer to temporary works.

In Hart Investments v Fidler the court held that a consulting engineer was liable to the employer for the collapse of part of a building into a deep excavation. The cause of the collapse was patently inadequate support to the building during excavation. The engineer was specifically engaged by the employer to design the permanent works - for which he accepted full responsibility - but not the temporary works. Yet the engineer was held liable to the employer for the consequences of there being inadequacies with the temporary works.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from