Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2013

Case Update

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

In "Imam-Sadeque v BlueBay Asset Management", the High Court considered two important issues.

United KingdomEmployment and HR

The duty of good faith and the penalty doctrine

In Imam-Sadeque v BlueBay Asset Management, the High Court considered two important issues: whether the duty of good faith is reduced during garden leave and whether the penalty doctrine applied to a clause in a compromise agreement.

When Mr Imam-Sadeque, an asset manager at BlueBay, resigned he was not entitled to unvested awards under the terms of the incentive plan because he was not a "good leaver". However, he negotiated a compromise agreement which included a provision that he would be considered a "good leaver" and therefore entitled to fund units for 2012 if he did not breach the terms of his contract during his notice period (which included non-competition, confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses). BlueBay subsequently discovered that, while still employed, Mr Imam-Sadeque agreed to join and helped a competitor start up, disclosed confidential business information and was heavily involved in the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from