Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2014

Claiming For Group Losses

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

The Scottish equivalent of the Court of Appeal has recently confirmed that a parent company is not able to claim for losses suffered by its subsidiaries if the third party breaches the contract.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Andrew Blankfield
Andrew Blankfield

The Scottish equivalent of the Court of Appeal has recently confirmed that a parent company, which has made a contract with a third party, is not able to claim for losses suffered by its subsidiaries if the third party breaches the contract.  The decision itself is not surprising, being based on the principle, well established both in England and Scotland, that a parent company and its subsidiary have separate legal personalities.  However, the case highlights the pitfalls that can arise in the contractual arrangements of groups of companies.  The case is The Harbro Group Ltd v MHA Auchlochan.

Harbro Group Ltd bought some land.  Under the purchase contract, the sellers agreed to construct an access road to the land, but there was delay in completing the road and Harbro claimed they were in breach of contract.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from