Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2008

£800m Northern Ireland Framework Hangs In The Balance

The long established principle that public authorities must ensure transparency when awarding a public contract including by stating the evaluation criteria to bidders before their bids are prepared, has been hammered home recently by the High Court of Northern Ireland.

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

The long established principle that public authorities must ensure transparency when awarding a public contract including by stating the evaluation criteria to bidders before their bids are prepared, has been hammered home recently by the High Court of Northern Ireland. In McLaughlin & Harvey v Department of Finance and Personnel No. 2 the defendant (DFP) was found to have evaluated bids on the basis of 39 criteria, sub-criteria and weightings that had not been fully disclosed.

The Facts

A tendering procedure was carried out by the Central Purchasing Directorate (on behalf of DFP) in order to select five contractors to a Framework Agreement for construction contracts with an estimated value of between £500 to £800 million. McLaughlin & Harvey (McLaughlin) were unsuccessful and a debriefing revealed that their bid (together with the other bids) had been evaluated against a methodology that had not been disclosed in advance of bid submission. So, McLaughlin argued

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from