Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2012

Use Of Oral Evidence In IP Litigation

Although parties in IP cases will generally be required to produce witnesses at trial, for less complicated cases documentary evidence may be sufficient.

ThailandIntellectual Property

Although parties in IP cases will generally be required to produce witnesses at trial, for less complicated cases documentary evidence may be sufficient.

The usual procedure in IP litigation is for the Plaintiff to file a Complaint, and the Defendant a Reply, with the Central Intellectual Property and International Trade Court (CIPITC). The judge then fixes a date for directions, which will normally include the fixing of dates for the examination of witnesses of each party. The parties are required to inform the Court of the number of witnesses they intend to rely on. Normally, the Plaintiff examines its witnesses first, then the Defendant examines its witnesses, with each party having the opportunity to cross examine the witnesses of the other party. There is then often an opportunity for the parties to respond to any questions arising from the cross-examination. Closing statements are delivered by each party, following which the CIPITC reaches its decision.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from