Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Tax In Brief | Issue 97

Below, please find issue 97 of ENSafrica's tax in brief, a snapshot of the latest tax developments in South Africa.

South AfricaTax

Below, please find issue 97 of ENSafrica's tax in brief, a snapshot of the latest tax developments in South Africa.

case law

  • Tax Court | Applicant X v Commissioner for The South African Revenue Service (2022/12) [2022] ZATC 11
    • This case relates to an application for a default judgment in terms of rule 56 (2) of the Tax Court Rules ("Rules") promulgated in terms of section 103 of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) ("TAA").
    • The applicant filed the application for default judgment following the notices delivered in terms of Rule 56(1)(a) to the South African Revenue Service ("SARS") to address the objections that he had raised.
    • SARS opposed the application on the ground that the application was not properly before the court on the basis that the application was not properly delivered to SARS in terms of the Rules.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from