Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

South Africa's SCA Reinforces Judicial Support For Arbitration Agreements

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Emerging arbitration jurisdictions often face challenges in establishing themselves as credible and reliable seats for international arbitration with a key focus on achieving minimal judicial intervention.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Emerging arbitration jurisdictions often face challenges in establishing themselves as credible and reliable seats for international arbitration with a key focus on achieving minimal judicial intervention. This however presents somewhat of a contradiction because the attitude of the court will generally only be evidenced through its published judgments.

This is why, when courts are involved, their decisions must be clear, consistent, and aligned with international best practice. In Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited and Another v Kalagadi Manganese (Pty) Ltd, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") delivered a decisive judgment that reinforced the binding nature of arbitration agreements and underscored South Africa's adherence to international arbitration principles.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from