Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2026

SCA Confirms The High Court’s Concurrent Jurisdiction Over NCA Shortfall Claims

The Supreme Court of Appeal has resolved a critical jurisdictional question affecting credit providers nationwide by clarifying whether the High Court retains authority to adjudicate shortfall claims after repossession and sale of goods under credit agreements.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) confirmed that section 127(8) of the National Credit Act, 2005 (“NCA”) does not confer exclusive jurisdiction on the Magistrates’ Court in respect of shortfall claims following the repossession and sale of goods under credit agreements. On 22 May 2026, the SCA delivered judgment in Dreyer NO and Another v Standard Bank and Nedbank Limited and Another v Abrahams on 22 May 2026.

The matter arose from two applications decided by different Divisions of the High Court.

In the first matter, The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (“Standard Bank”) entered into three instalment sale agreements with the Doornfontein Trust on 14 August 2017. The Trust defaulted on its obligations, and on 23 August 2019, Standard Bank obtained an order from the High Court requiring the appellants to return various assets. Standard Bank repossessed the assets and sold them at auction, but a shortfall remained. When Standard Bank returned to the North West Division of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from