Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MARCH 2026

Long Service Is Not An Absolute Shield Against Gross Negligence

The matter arose following the dismissal of Mr Gerhard Goosen, a service mechanic with nearly 30 years of experience at Algoa Bus Company (ABC).

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Labour Court ruling in Algoa Bus Company (Pty) Ltd v South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council and Others.

The Labour Court in Gqeberha recently delivered an important judgment in the case of Algoa Bus Company (Pty) Ltd v South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council and Others. The case serves as a reminder regarding the standard of evidence required at arbitration and the dangers of speculation.

Background to the Dispute

The matter arose following the dismissal of Mr Gerhard Goosen, a service mechanic with nearly 30 years of experience at Algoa Bus Company (ABC). Mr Goosen was dismissed for gross negligence after a bus gearbox he had just serviced sustained major internal damage, leading to a repair bill of approximately R490 000. While ABC contended that the damage was caused by Goosen taking the bus for a test drive without first refilling it with oil, Goosen maintained that he had indeed added 20 litres of oil before the drive. The central factual dispute was whether

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from