Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2019

Symptoms Of Withdrawal

The procedural directives issued by the Judge President of the Labour Court in the 2013 Practice Manual have played an invaluable role in promoting consistency and certainty in the practices of the Labour Court, ...

South AfricaEmployment and HR

The Labour Court's different approach to the deemed withdrawal of review applications

This article was prepared by Neil Searle and candidate Emma Alimohammadi.

The procedural directives issued by the Judge President of the Labour Court in the 2013 Practice Manual have played an invaluable role in promoting consistency and certainty in the practices of the Labour Court, particularly in relation to the prosecution of review applications under section 145 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (LRA). However, one such directive has, despite the best intentions of the Judge President, resulted in considerable procedural uncertainty.

The offending directive is contained in paragraph 11.2 of the Practice Manual and provides that, in a review application, the record of the relevant arbitration proceedings must be filed within 60 days of the date on which the applicant is advised by the registrar of the Labour Court that the record has been received and, if the applicant

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from