Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2017

Joint Accounts - The New Shield?

Although the sum involved was small, the High Court's decision in One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee) [2016] SGHC 208 . . .

SingaporeFinance and Banking

A case review on One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee) [2016] SGHC 208

INTRODUCTION

Although the sum involved was small, the High Court's decision in One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee) [2016] SGHC 208 is one which would have a great impact in the area of enforcement of a judgment debt – A joint account held in the names of a judgment debtor and third parties jointly cannot be subject to attachment under a garnishee order.

This decision, together with the reasons the High Court used to justify it, now casts doubt on whether a bank is able to rely on a common clause found in security documents which allows it to combine any account held by a borrower (whether solely or jointly with a third party) together with the borrower's liabilities. More importantly, it now advances the possibility of borrowers using joint accounts as a shield against enforcement

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from