Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

134 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    【华源原创】从具体案例浅析创造性判断中的“公知常识”认定

    In patent examination, the concept of "common general knowledge" frequently appears as a supplementary argument beyond prior art documents. However, disputes surrounding its proper application have become a central focus in patentability challenges, particularly regarding what qualifies as legitimate evidence and how technical specificity must be maintained across different material systems.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    Service Of Process In Cross-Border Litigation: The Hague Service Convention And Practice In China, Hong Kong And The Cayman Islands (Part 2)

    Chinese enterprises with offshore structures in Hong Kong and the Cayman Islands face unique service-of-process challenges when sued in U.S. courts. This analysis examines how the Hague Service Convention operates across Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR, and the Cayman Islands, revealing critical differences in postal service availability and procedural flexibility that can determine whether companies receive timely notice of litigation.
    Global
International Law
Purplevine IP Group
Purplevine IP Group
  • Article

    Repetitive Litigation Based On The Principle Of Double Jeopardy

    Repetitive litigation, as a legal concept, relates to the principle of double jeopardy (non bis in idem).
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    WTO Appellate Body Rules Against Chinese Export Restrictions

    On January 30, 2012, the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO) circulated its decision on Chinese export restrictions on various raw materials (WT/DS394/AB/R; WT/DS395AB/R; WT/DS398/AB/R).
    ChinaInternational Law
    Mayer Brown
    Mayer Brown
  • Article

    Recent Development Of The Forum Non Conveniens Principle In China

    Last year, China amended its Civil Procedure Law. On 1 January 2024, the amended Civil Procedure Law was implemented.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    The Supreme People's Court clarifies main issues on Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of China

    The Judicial Interpretation of 21 articles mainly regulates existing major issues found in the enforcement of the Law.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Dacheng Law Offices
    Dacheng Law Offices
  • Article

    从京东“自动结算尾款”案看专利保护客体的判断与争辩策略:一个价值千万的改判,揭示了商业方法专利的“胜败密码”

    最高人民法院2024年的一起改判案件揭示了商业方法专利在中国的保护边界。京东集团的"拼购"专利经历了从驳回到胜诉的戏剧性转折,核心争议在于&#
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    从两个案例看参数限定的妙用 —— 把“怎么做”变成“是什么”

    Patent practitioners often struggle with method claims due to enforcement challenges. This article explores how converting method inventions into product claims using parameter features can significantly strengthen patent protection and simplify infringement evidence collection, illustrated through detailed case studies of polyurethane polishing pads and polyarylene ether copolymers.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    Recognition And Cross-class Protection Of Well-known Trademarks In China

    Well-known trademark protection provides expanded safeguards for brands with high reputation and influence, yet malicious trademark squatting and cross-class imitation pose growing challenges. This analysis examines a landmark Beijing Intellectual Property Court case involving a luxury automobile brand to illuminate the recognition criteria for well-known trademarks and the application of cross-class protection under China's 2019 Trademark Law.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
    CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
  • Article

    Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In China

    Abstract: In recent years, with China's increasing emphasis on opening-up, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments has become more readily provided for under China's laws and judicial practice.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    SPC Released Guiding Cases On Boosting Judicial IP Protection For Technological Innovation

    China's Supreme People's Court has released seven guiding cases that establish new precedents for intellectual property protection, addressing critical issues from trade secret theft through employee poaching to malicious patent litigation. These landmark rulings introduce detailed enforcement mechanisms, clarify liability standards for online seed sales platforms, and strengthen remedies for copyright holders facing evidence obstruction.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Panawell & Partners, LLC
    Panawell & Partners, LLC
  • Article

    最高人民法院知的財産権法廷裁判要旨(2023)

    ーーコンピュータソフトウェア、技術関連知財契約、手続き関連紛争事件
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    对于小型微型企业破产程序的特别规定的分析——《企业破产法(修订草案)》一审稿与二审稿条文对照

    China's revised Enterprise Bankruptcy Law introduces a dedicated chapter establishing streamlined bankruptcy procedures specifically for small and micro enterprises.
    ChinaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    及跨境诉讼的影响(下)

    本次民诉法修改,除了着力于扩展我国管辖权所辐射的领域,更是顺应国际趋势,积极破解我国涉外管辖规则滞后于实践需求的困境,其中尤为瞩目
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    代孕子女的身份与国籍认定

    代孕的出现打破了传统的母子关系认定原则,使得基因母亲、分娩母亲与抚养母亲可能分属不同的人。这种复杂性不仅在中国法律体系中引发亲子
    ChinaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    美国文件开示中的国家秘密问题

    美国证据开示制度(Discovery)是指在诉讼过程中,双方当事人通过预定的法律程序相互获取对方掌握的相关证据,以便公平地准备案件审理。
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    人工智能参与司法程序的边界:从当事人到律师

    随着人工智能在法律领域的深度应用,当事人与律师使用人工智能工具的边界问题日益凸显。就当事人层面而言,本文以美国United States v. Heppner案为切入点,
    ChinaTechnology
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    No More Hindsight Bias: China’s Supreme People's Court Reins In Patent Inventiveness Assessments

    China's Supreme People's Court has issued a landmark ruling that fundamentally reshapes how patent inventiveness is assessed, moving away from subjective hindsight bias...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Eagle IP
    Eagle IP
  • Article

    国际仲裁案件中的费用管理工具(一):密封和解要约

    As Chinese enterprises accelerate their global expansion, international arbitration has become a critical mechanism for resolving cross-border disputes.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    Stability, Progress, And A Farsighted Vision In Arbitration Law (2025 Revision)

    China's revised Arbitration Law of 2025 introduces groundbreaking reforms that enhance internationalization, standardize industry practices, and elevate arbitration to equal status with litigation. This comprehensive analysis examines the law's key innovations—including the adoption of seat-based jurisdiction, formal recognition of ad hoc arbitration, and expanded technological integration—while identifying potential regulatory gaps that may impact cross-border dispute resolution.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    JTJB International Lawyers
    JTJB International Lawyers
  • Showing 61–80 of 134 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics