Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2026

Justice Delayed: When The Court Becomes A Waiting Room

In Nigeria, justice is not often measured by verdicts, but by waiting, and by waiting, this means, unfortunately, prolonged trials, delayed rulings, and overcrowded prisons, which have all turned courts into actual waiting rooms, like a woman waiting to conceive. This article examines the possible factors behind judicial delay, arguing that it is not merely a procedural flaw but a complex interplay of financial incentives, abuse of procedural safeguards, strategically prolonged litigation, and institutional inefficiencies.

NigeriaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Hilda Omono Okoduwa
Hilda Omono Okoduwa
Author LinkedIn connections

Introduction

 In Nigeria, the courtroom has progressively become a backlog waiting area. Of over 80,000 inmates across the country, more than 50,000 are awaiting trial,2 with a high probability that there could be ‘innocent’ ones amongst them. Yet, the crisis of delay is not confined to criminal justice alone.

Considering civil and commercial litigation, there are cases such as Amadi v. NNPC3 that has revealed how interlocutory applications and preliminary objections can significantly delay litigation for years, before the substantive matter is heard and determined.4

Also, in electoral matters, as seen in Amaechi v. INEC,5 justice is seen to be frequently overtaken by political realities.  The case was decided only after the INEC office had already been occupied, which clearly defeated the purpose of instituting the matter in the first instance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from