In May of last year, the Nigerian Senate passed the Arbitration
and Mediation Bill 2022 (the "2022 Bill"), representing
the most significant reform of its arbitration law in over thirty
years (assuming it is not affected by the upcoming general
election).1 The legislation it
replaced, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1988, based on the
1985 edition of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial
Arbitration (the "1988 Act"), has come under significant
criticism in recent years.
Criticisms of the 1988 Act
A particular point of criticism has been the lack of provisions
for interim relief in support of an arbitration, as under the 1988
Act, only an arbitral tribunal may grant interim relief, and this
is only in respect of a pending arbitration. 2 This lacuna has
occasionally caused issues for parties seeking injunctive relief
before the Nigerian courts, as illustrated in the case of NV
Scheep v MV S Araz (2000)3, where the Nigerian
Supreme Court refused