ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2020

The Risks Of Claims Against Solicitors Regarding Expert Evidence

Beale & Co

Explore more from Beale & Co

Experts have an unusual dual role in litigation, in that they owe...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Andrew Jones

Expert evidence can make or break a party's case at trial. Andrew Jones and Joe Bryant look at three recent Court decisions where the parties got it wrong and consider the risks to solicitors acting in litigation regarding expert evidence.

Experts have an unusual dual role in litigation, in that they owe:

A duty of care to their instructing party. This is a duty to provide expert opinion within a reasonable range; and
A duty to the Court to provide objective, unbiased, impartial and independent evidence. This duty overrides the above duty to their instructing party. Experts should follow the requirements set out in Part 35 of the Civil procedure Rules and the Civil Justice Council's "Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

How To Enforce A Foreign Court Judgment In Ireland

European UnionLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Construction Disputes And Risk After Tenderbids (Part 2)

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

William Fry LLP

Delay In Security For Costs Applications

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

William Fry LLP

Representative Actions In Ireland: New Rules, First Judgment

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Premier League 114 V Manchester City 1: Extra Time Looming

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

Comparative Guide

Class Actions

Comparative Guide

Litigation

Comparative Guide

International Arbitration

See more popular content from

Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Supreme Court Confirms Personal Injury Guidelines Are Legally Binding

The Supreme Court, in Delaney v The Personal Injuries Assessment Board, the Judicial Council, Ireland and the Attorney General [2024] IESC10, has upheld the legality...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Premier League 114 V Manchester City 1: Extra Time Looming

Manchester City faces 114 proven charges out of 115 brought by the Premier League for financial rule breaches spanning nearly a decade. The independent Commission found evidence of a "Disguised Funding Scheme" that overstated the club's revenue by over £830 million, raising questions about potential sanctions, appeals, and compensation claims from rival clubs.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

New High Court Practice Direction On The Responsible Use Of GenAI In Court Documents

The High Court has issued a new Practice Direction governing the use of generative AI in litigation, establishing mandatory disclosure requirements for affidavits, witness statements and expert reports. Legal practitioners must now ensure all AI-generated content is verified, accurate and compliant with professional obligations, with significant sanctions for non-compliance including costs orders and potential referral to regulatory authorities.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Raising The Bar: Irish Supreme Court Confirms “strong Case” Test For Pre-trial Stays Of Regulatory Decisions

Ireland's Supreme Court has established a significantly higher threshold for obtaining interim stays on regulatory decisions that affect broad public interests. Companies challenging decisions by bodies like the Data Protection Commission must now demonstrate a "strong case" likely to succeed at trial, rather than merely an "arguable case," before courts will even consider granting temporary relief.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Gatekeeping Justice: What 153 Supreme Court Determinations In 2025 Tell Us About Likely Trends For 2026

This article examines the Supreme Court's evolving role following Ireland's 2014 constitutional amendment, analyzing how the establishment of the Court of Appeal transformed the Supreme Court into a specialized tribunal for cases of exceptional public importance. Through a comprehensive review of 153 determinations made in 2025, the analysis explores the criteria for securing leave to appeal and identifies emerging trends in the application of the "Karshan factor" for leapfrog appeals.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

McCann FitzGerald LLP

Landmark Supreme Court Judgment On Evidence

The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of DPP v JC [2015] IESC 31 where it articulated a new exclusionary rule concerning unconstitutionally obtained evidence.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

High Court Upholds Letters Rogatory Despite Non-disclosure At Ex Parte Stage

The Irish High Court has clarified the standards for material non-disclosure in ex parte Letters Rogatory applications, examining when procedural omissions warrant setting aside judicial assistance orders. This decision explores the balance between full disclosure obligations and the court's discretion to maintain orders where non-disclosure was inadvertent and no prejudice resulted.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Navigating Public Inquiries (Part 2): Process And Documentary Evidence

Public inquiries must adhere to strict procedural fairness and natural justice requirements, but achieving this can be challenging as the process evolves.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

McCann FitzGerald LLP

Supreme Court Sets New Rules On Delay In Security For Costs Applications

In the most significant ruling on security for costs in many years, the Supreme Court has delivered a judgment clarifying the operation of security for costs and providing important guidance for litigants and practitioners.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Representative Actions In Ireland: New Rules, First Judgment

Ireland's new High Court rules establish a clear procedural framework for representative consumer actions, while the landmark ICCL v Microsoft case clarifies key questions about admissibility requirements and the burden of proof under GDPR. These developments provide businesses and qualified entities with greater certainty about how collective redress claims will be conducted, though significant cost barriers remain despite the new court fee exemption.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration