Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2026

Navigating Public Inquiries (Part 2): Process And Documentary Evidence

McCann FitzGerald LLP
McCann FitzGerald LLP
Contributor
McCann FitzGerald LLP

McCann FitzGerald LLP

McCann FitzGerald LLP’s London office acts for Irish, UK and international clients on Irish law...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCann FitzGerald LLP

Public inquiries must adhere to strict procedural fairness and natural justice requirements, but achieving this can be challenging as the process evolves.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the first briefing in our series on public inquiries (see here) we explained how a public inquiry typically commences and identified the issues to consider at the start of an inquiry. In this second briefing in our series, we address some process related themes we commonly encounter when advising clients involved in public inquiries.

Every public inquiry must follow a process which is lawful and procedurally fair. Although some points of nuance arise as between the different forms of public inquiry (commissions of investigation, tribunals of inquiry, parliamentary inquiries, company inspections, etc), it is vital that all public inquiries adhere to fair procedures and natural justice. Getting the process right can, however, be challenging. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from