Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2026

High Court Upholds Letters Rogatory Despite Non-disclosure At Ex Parte Stage

The Irish High Court has clarified the standards for material non-disclosure in ex parte Letters Rogatory applications, examining when procedural omissions warrant setting aside judicial assistance orders. This decision explores the balance between full disclosure obligations and the court's discretion to maintain orders where non-disclosure was inadvertent and no prejudice resulted.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent decision in Runbuk Inc v Ice Cap Adventures and David Kelly [2026] IEHC 644, the High Court refused to set aside an ex-parte order giving effect to a request for cross-border judicial assistance, otherwise known as a Letters Rogatory, in circumstances where the plaintiff had failed to make full and frank disclosure in its ex parte application.

The decision confirms that material non-disclosure of facts at the ex parte stage, even where “more serious”, is not fatal to an application. Instead, the Court will exercise its discretion carefully, in a manner conditioned by the overall context of the non-disclosure.

Key takeaways

  • Applicants seeking Letters Rogatory should ensure all material facts and procedural developments are disclosed when making ex parte applications

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from