Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 AUGUST 2018

The Importance Of Pursuing All Defendants In Irish Litigation

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

Section 35(1) of the Irish Civil Liability Act 1961, as amended, lists a number of grounds by which a plaintiff's acts or omissions with respect to the liability of concurrent wrongdoers can result in a reduction of...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Section 35(1) of the Irish Civil Liability Act 1961, as amended, (the "Act") lists a number of grounds by which a plaintiff's acts or omissions with respect to the liability of concurrent wrongdoers can result in a reduction of the plaintiff's award.  Those acts or omissions include entering into exclusion clauses, limitation clauses, and/or settlements with a concurrent wrongdoer.  

One particular ground that has been the focus of recent judicial comment is the failure of the plaintiff to sue a concurrent wrongdoer, resulting in the claim as against that not-joined wrongdoer becoming statute-barred (pursuant to s. 35(1)(i) of the Act).

A party who has been joined as a defendant to an action can claim that, should the plaintiff succeed in its case, then the plaintiff should be fixed with the liability of the not-joined concurrent wrongdoer. In this way, the joined defendant only becomes liable for his or her share of the plaintiff's total loss, rather than all of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from