Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Supreme Court Clarifies Emotional Distress Claims: PIAB Authorisation Not Required

RDJ LLP
RDJ LLP
Contributor
RDJ LLP

RDJ LLP

RDJ is one of Ireland’s leading corporate law firms. With more than 300 employees and offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from RDJ LLP

On 25 July 2025, the Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision in Dillon v Irish Life Assurance Plc [2025] IESC 37, which clarifies the treatment of emotional distress claims...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 25 July 2025, the Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision in Dillon v Irish Life Assurance Plc [2025] IESC 37, which clarifies the treatment of emotional distress claims that do not meet the threshold of recognised psychiatric injury. The Supreme Court has ruled that claims for emotional distress such as upset, anxiety, and inconvenience, which do not involve a recognised psychiatric injury, are not considered personal injury claims under Irish law. This means that PIAB authorisation is not needed before issuing proceedings.

Background

This case involved repeated data breaches by Irish Life Assurance over a 12-year period, during which the plaintiff's personal and financial information was mistakenly sent to a third party. In response, the plaintiff instituted proceedings alleging negligence and breach of duty, seeking damages for emotional distress, upset, anxiety, and inconvenience. Crucially, he did not first obtain authorisation from the Personal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from