Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2020

Principles For Interlocutory Injunctions Refined By The Supreme Court

Dillon Eustace
Dillon Eustace
Contributor
Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace is one of Ireland’s leading law firms focusing on asset management and investment...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dillon Eustace

Two key decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal in Merck, Sharp & Dohme v Clonmel Healthcare Limited and Betty Martin Financial Services Limited v EBS DAC ...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Two key decisions of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal in Merck, Sharp & Dohme v Clonmel Healthcare Limited and Betty Martin Financial Services Limited v EBS DAC have significantly refined the well-settled principles to be applied in applications for injunctive relief. The test for granting preliminary injunctions in Ireland was originally set down by the Supreme Court in Campus Oil v Minister for Industry and Energy (No.2) and the Courts have, until now, strictly adhered to it. An overview of the Campus Oil test was set out in a previous Dillon Eustace briefing which may be accessed here.

The Merck Judgment

This case concerned the application by Merck for a preliminary injunction against Clonmel, to restrain them from producing a generic drug in contravention of Merck's intellectual property rights.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from