Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JANUARY 2023

Divergence On The Proximity Test For "Nervous Shock"– Will It Last?

RDJ LLP
RDJ LLP
Contributor
RDJ LLP

RDJ LLP

RDJ is one of Ireland’s leading corporate law firms. With more than 300 employees and offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from RDJ LLP

In 2022, the Court of Appeal in Sheehan v Bus Éireann[1] delivered a helpful judgment re-stating the criteria for plaintiffs bringing claims for nervous shock.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In 2022, the Court of Appeal in Sheehan v Bus Éireann1 delivered a helpful judgment re-stating the criteria for plaintiffs bringing claims for nervous shock. The Court affirmed the High Court judgment awarding damages to a woman who had come across the body of a driver at the scene of an accident between a car and a bus. The car she was driving was struck by debris from the crash.

Mr Justice Noonan noted that Irish law, "at least to date",2gives no consideration to any criteria which differentiates between victims of a primary or secondary nature. He added that even if the distinction was recognised in this jurisdiction, this Plaintiff would have recovered as a primary victim due to her collision with debris, which put her at risk of physical injury.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from