Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MARCH 2026

Data Centres, Climate Obligations, And Mathematical Argument Limitations

William Fry LLP
William Fry LLP
Contributor
William Fry LLP

William Fry LLP

William Fry advises leading Irish and international companies, covering both the public and private...

View firm profile
Explore more from William Fry LLP

The applicants (two environmental NGOs and three individuals) challenged An Coimisiún Pleanála's (Commission) decision to permit six two-storey data centre buildings on a 60-hectare site...

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Doyle & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála (No. 3), the High Court (Court) dismissed a judicial review challenge to planning permission for a hyper-scale data centre near Ennis, Co. Clare.

The applicants (two environmental NGOs and three individuals) challenged An Coimisiún Pleanála's (Commission) decision to permit six two-storey data centre buildings on a 60-hectare site, with a 120MW gas-powered energy centre and associated substation infrastructure.

This was the third instalment in the Doyle litigation. Module I addressed a bat roost issue and was dismissed. The second judgment in Module I dealt with costs.

Module II, heard in March 2026, tackled the climate grounds. What makes this judgment significant is the Court's detailed application of the Supreme Court's framework in Coolglass v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2026] IESC 5 to an emissions-causing development for the first time at the High Court level. The applicants lost on every ground.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from