Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2026

AG Opinion: Key Clarification On AA And AA Screening

William Fry LLP
William Fry LLP
Contributor
William Fry LLP

William Fry LLP

William Fry advises leading Irish and international companies, covering both the public and private...

View firm profile
Explore more from William Fry LLP

The European Court of Justice's Advocate General has issued an opinion addressing whether valid conservation objectives for special protection areas are required before conducting appropriate assessments under the Habitats Directive. This interpretation could significantly impact development consent procedures across the EU, particularly for large-scale projects where site-specific conservation objectives have not yet been formally established.

IrelandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 16 April 2026, Advocate General Kokott delivered her Opinion (Opinion) in joined cases C-27/25 – Knocknamona and C-356/25 – Massey, concluding that the setting of site-specific conservation objectives (SSCOs) is not a prerequisite for Appropriate Assessment (AA) and AA screening.

The Opinion is a welcome response to a net, but fundamental, point of interpretation of the Habitats Directive.

The Opinion arises from a preliminary ruling request by the Irish Court of Appeal in Knocknamona, asking, in essence, whether valid conservation objectives for a special protection area (SPA) are a prerequisite to the competent authority’s jurisdiction to carry out a valid appropriate assessment under the Habitats Directive when considering an application for a grant of development consent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from