Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2025

The Article 142 Blackhole: Is Gayatri Balasamy The Much-Needed Push To Finally Trigger Legislative Intervention?

AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners
Contributor
AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners, one of India’s premier law firms was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to...

View firm profile
Explore more from AZB & Partners

On April 30, 2025, a five judge constitutional bench (by a majority of 4:1) of the Supreme Court of India ("SC") passed the much awaited judgment in Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This piece was originally published on the Kluwer Arbitration Blog at: https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2025/06/02/the-article-142-blackhole-is-gayatri-balasamy-the-much-needed-push-to-finally-trigger-legislative-intervention/

On April 30, 2025, a five judge constitutional bench (by a majority of 4:1) of the Supreme Court of India ("SC") passed the much awaited judgment in Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited ("Judgment") on the issue of whether a court, hearing a challenge to the arbitral award, can modify the award.

As discussed in our previous post, this Judgment could have potentially put an end to the controversy of whether and to what extent courts can interfere and modify an arbitral award. In this article, we discuss how the constitutional bench of the SC tackled this issue and whether it has succeeded in its mandate of putting an end to the on-going debate, as many had hoped.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from