In 1996, India replaced its 1940 arbitration enactment with a
modern regime. The new Act was a blend of two United Nations
documents - the UNCITRAL Model Law, 1985 and the UNCITRAL
Arbitration Rules, 1976. These were tried and tested templates, the
world over.
In India, however, the working of the Act has constantly run
into trouble; riddled with too much court intervention and too
little court support. Three decades of effort have not borne fruit
as hoped for.
Here are some suggestions on what the government can do to
promote a better arbitration regime:
Help build the ecosystem: Arbitration
is sui generis. It is not court litigation. It needs a
certain ecosystem. This has many parts and players and even with
the best intentions, takes some doing. The government in particular
can do its bit. Within about two decades, Singapore has risen from
a marginal player to a top arbitration hub. To some measure, the
credit goes to its government promoting 'Maxwell