Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2020

Seat Venue Dichotomy In The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

The concept of seat is extremely important for arbitration as it is deeply attached to the lexarbitri i.e.the law of the juridical seat of the arbitration is the law that is to be applied to the arbitral proceedings.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

The concept of seat is extremely important for arbitration as it is deeply attached to the lexarbitri i.e.the law of the juridical seat of the arbitration is the law that is to be applied to the arbitral proceedings.1The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( hereinafter 'The Act') has not clearly defined the concept of seat and venue which has therefore shifted the onus on the courts to clear the ambiguities by the way of judicial pronouncements. The provisions relevant for understanding conspectus of seat and venue under the 1996 Act are Sections 2(2) and 20.

On 10th December 2019, the Supreme Court of India in the case of BGS SGS Soma JV v. NHPC Ltd.2gave a landmark judgement which has temporarily settled the position with respect to the seat and venue of an arbitration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from