Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2026

Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter - October 2026

The October 2026 edition of Fox & Mandal's Dispute Resolution & ADR Newsletter analyses the status of assets of a dissolved partnership sought to be retained by a successor firm; belated payment of deficient stamp duty on arbitral awards; primacy of Court jurisdiction clause over an arbitral venue for deciding seat; continuation of CIRP despite fraudulent initiation; and other recent judgments of the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Assets of a dissolved partnership cannot be retained by a successor firm without settling the former partners’ entitlements

V Sumitra Reddy v. K Ranganadha Reddy

Supreme Court of India | 2026 INSC 979

In a significant decision, the Supreme Court clarified that a partner's entitlement to undistributed assets of a dissolved partnership cannot necessarily be restricted to their value on the date of dissolution. It further held that a newly constituted partnership cannot retain assets of the dissolved firm without settling the former partners' entitlements.

Unlike partnerships with a fixed duration or LLPs, a partnership at will may be dissolved by any partner through written notice, triggering the settlement and distribution of the firm's assets. This distinction has significant commercial implications, as the remaining partners cannot simply continue using those assets through a new partnership without settling the former partners' entitlements. Consequently, even a single partner's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from