Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2025

Avoiding A Non-est Filing: A Look At Common Filing Pitfalls Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

Challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act") is not just a procedural formality—it is a time-bound legal remedy which is governed by strict timelines.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act") is not just a procedural formality—it is a time-bound legal remedy which is governed by strict timelines. Section 34(3) of the A&C Act provides for an inflexible limitation period of three months from the date of receipt of the award (extendable only by 30 days upon sufficient cause being shown), post that the Courts cannot entertain a challenge petition.

Indian Courts, particularly the High Court of Delhi, has over the years created a robust jurisprudence on essentials of a valid filing under Section 34 of the A&C Act. The law has now evolved to distinguish between:

  1. Defects that are fatal and render the filing non-est from inception, and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views / position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up, please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected].

See more popular content from