Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2022

A Relief For Permanent Injunction Cannot Be Granted On The Basis Of An Unregistered Document Or Agreement To Sell

The Apex Court further observed that a relief cannot be got indirectly which otherwise could not have been got in a suit for substantive relief.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

INTRODUCTION:

The Apex Court in a recent decision in Balram Singh vs. Kelo Devi1 observed that a relief for permanent injunction on the basis of an unregistered document or agreement to sell, could not be granted. The Apex Court further observed that a relief cannot be got indirectly which otherwise could not have been got in a suit for substantive relief.

FACTS:

One Kelo Devi, the Respondent, had instituted a Suit for permanent injunction, before the Trial Court, to restrain the Appellant (the Defendant therein) from disturbing the Respondent's possession in the suit property ("said Suit").

The Respondent relied on an unregistered agreement to sell dated 23rd March, 1996 ("said Agreement") in the said Suit.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from