In practice, more often than not, in a dispute over title of a land/property, it is seen that the parties assert their title by placing reliance upon their name being reflected in the revenue records.

The High Court discussed the provisions of Sections 2 and 26 of the Succession Act and stated that the two provisions have to be read together and not in isolation.

The Appellant has a showroom to its name in which watches are sold. In 2001, post operational hours, a theft occurred in the premises.

On 24th November, 2020 the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its decision passed by the Bench of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Ravindra Bhat in B.K. Ravichandra & Ors. v. Union of India...

Appellant No.1, a partnership firm owned 249.60 bighas (approx. 100 acres) of land. The said land was acquired by the Respondent – Company vide notification dated 13th March, 1973.

In the matter of Jitendra Kumar Soneja vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, dealt with the issue of the tax treatment of any cash compensation received by an assessee towards any hardship caused to the assessee ...

Thereafter, the Appellant preferred a Review Application which also came to be dismissed by the High Court. Hence, the Appellant moved the Supreme Court by way of a Special Leave Petition.

The Appellant No. 1, a registered Charitable Trust, intended to develop the land owned by it.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, vide its landmark judgment in the case of M/s SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. V/s. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 1638 of 2019 arising out of S.L.P (C) No. 103/2019) ...

Under the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 particularly Section 10-A, an electronic contract is valid and enforceable.

The prohibition contained in section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, ("the Act") against the initiation and continuation of legal proceedings...

A foreign award was passed in London on 12th February 2015 ordering the Appellant to pay damages and interest thereon.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in its decision dated 10th July, 2019 in HDFC v. RHC Holding Private Limited [Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency)No. 26 of 2019] while upholding the order of the ...

Recently, the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, in Heligo Charters Vs Aircon Belbars FZE discussed the applicability of the Section 9 (Interim Reliefs) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ...

The Supreme Court in Alka Chandewar v. Shamshul Ishrar Khan held, that if any party fails to comply with the orders of the Arbitral Tribunal under section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ...

The Bombay High Court's common judgement dated 19th July, 2017 in two public interest litigations was impugned before the Apex Court.

In the matter of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited v. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited & Ors., 2018(2)Bom.C.R. 739, the apex court addressed the issues of whether the provisions of the SARFAESI Act 202 ...

Bail, in law, is used for the release of a person charged with an offence, on his providing a security that will ensure his presence before the court or any other authority whenever required.

In effect, a frivolous suit filed by a third party in respect of the property will not be a clog on the title.

The Supreme Court of India in a landmark decision in the case of Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia v. State Of Gujarat And Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 2573 of 2020] held an assignment of an agricultural land by way of a "will" ...