Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2010

Super Cassettes Granted Injunction in Cyber-Squatting Suit

Lex Orbis
Explore more from Lex Orbis

Cyber-squatting is a crime that is commonly defined as registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with mala fide intent to make profit from the goodwill of a domain name registered in somebody else’s name.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Author LinkedIn connections

Cyber-squatting is a crime that is commonly defined as registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with mala fide intent to make profit from the goodwill of a domain name registered in somebody else's name. The cybersquatter offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price. These practices include the deliberate mala fide registration in the hope of being able to enable one to take unfair advantage of the reputation attached to those marks. The recent judgment of Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs Wang Zhi Zhu Ce Yong HU and Ors. {2009(39) PTC 162 (Del)} highlights this phenomenon and its severity.

The Instant suit was filed by Super Cassettes Industries for the relief of permanent injunction against the defendants Zhi Wang Zhi Zhu Ce Yong HU (later referred as Zhi Wang) for using Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.'s trademark/trade name SUPER CASSETTES or any other name deceptively similar

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law