Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2009

Singer’s Plaint Allowed To Be Amended: Plea For Rejection Dismissed

Absence of jurisdiction is one of the primary grounds vouched while contending the rejection of a plaint in a civil suit.

IndiaIntellectual Property

Absence of jurisdiction is one of the primary grounds vouched while contending the rejection of a plaint in a civil suit. The present case of Singer Co. Ltd. and Anr. v. M/s Chetan Machine Tools and Ors. [2009 (39) PTC652] evidences an application for rejection of plaint for lack of jurisdiction by the defendants, while the plaintiffs seek an amendment of plaint to strengthen their grounds as to the Court's jurisdiction being present, in a Trademark dispute.

Singer Co. Ltd. and Singer India Ltd., proprietors of the country's largest and most successful sewing machine company , and having presence in over 150 countries under the trademark "Singer" which is registered since 1942. They moved to Court alleging Chetan Machine Tools of using a deceptively similar trademark and prayed for a decree of permanent injunction. In contravention, Chetan Machine Tools filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 to seek rejection of the plaint on the ground that no cause of action

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from