Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 NOVEMBER 2017

Copyright Protection Forarchitectural Works- Part II

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

Mischief rule is pertains to interpretation of statutes, and is applied by Courts when there is a conflict between two laws or provisions of law on interpreting it by the words ...

IndiaIntellectual Property

Application of Mischief rule by Courts

Mischief rule is pertains to interpretation of statutes, and is applied by Courts when there is a conflict between two laws or provisions of law on interpreting it by the words as stated in the particular law or is interpreted by the courts to resolve the confusion in its application. Delhi High Court in Microfibers Inc. vs Girdhar& Co. &Anr.1 where the "artistic work" in the fabrics was in question that if the design would be protected under the Copyright Act or the Design Act. The court by applying the mischief rule stated that the "the mischief sought to be prevented is not the mischief of copying but of the larger monopoly claimed by the design proponent inspite of commercial production."2 In other words it means that the copyright is protected in an article till 50 reproductions by the industrial process are made and beyond this limit the copyright ceases to exist. Delhi High Court by giving a reference to the particular

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from