Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2008

Appeal Opposing Injunction On MICO Fails

Dealing with an appeal challenging the order of a Single Judge granting an interim injunction is the case of “Micolube India Ltd. v. Maggon Auto Centre” 2008 (38)PTC 271 (Del.)(DB).

IndiaIntellectual Property

Dealing with an appeal challenging the order of a Single Judge granting an interim injunction is the case of Micolube India Ltd. v. Maggon Auto Centre 2008 (38)PTC 271 (Del.)(DB). Dealing with the trademark 'MICO', the injunction of the use of the mark until the final disposal of the suit was brought into challenge. It was also concluded therein that Micolube India had concealed and suppressed material facts and further that the ingredients of passing off as per settled principles were prima facie not established.

Motor Industries Co. Limited (the co-defendant), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913 had adopted MICO (an acronym of its corporate name) and for nearly 60 years had been using MICO as its distinctive trade mark in respect of all the products manufactured and marketed by them. Engaged in the business of diverse automotive products including spark plugs, fuel injection equipment, hydraulic and pneumatic equipment, car audio systems and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from