Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2009

Animated "Ramayana" In Copyright Row

Lex Orbis
Explore more from Lex Orbis

Interlude Technologies in pursuance of its suit for permanent injunction, filed an application for the grant of an interim injunction to restrain the infringement of copyright, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts, delivery up and damages.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Author LinkedIn connections

Interlude Technologies in pursuance of its suit for permanent injunction, filed an application for the grant of an interim injunction to restrain the infringement of copyright, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts, delivery up and damages. An ex parte ad interim injunction had been issued in respect of which an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 to obtain order for the injunction to be discharged varied or set aside vide Interlude Technologies Thr. Its Proprietor v. Popular Entertainment Network Ltd. & Ors. 2009 (40) PTC 485 (Del.)

Interlude an establishment since 1998 is engaged in the business of production, manufacturing and publishing of animated cinematography films on CD ROM, video CD, licensing and distribution of films of varied genre including nursery rhymes, mythological stories. Classical stories and so on. They also have a production studio and distribution system and are the only company in India engaged in the specialized

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law