Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2018

An Article On Shamnad Basheer v. Union Of India And Ors

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

Whether information provided under section 146 of the said Act "Confidential" nature of licensees and sub-licensees.

IndiaIntellectual Property

It is common to witness infringement cases in the intellectual property law sector but rarely there are suits which point out to the defects in the system managing the grant and working of patents, trademarks or other intellectual property rights.

In the case of Shamnad Basheer v. Union of India and Others 1, a writ-petition was filed against the defaulting patentees as well as the Patent Office as both of them were not complying with the statutory requirements.

Facts leading to the case

Section 83 (g) of the Patents Act, 1970 clearly mentions that "patents are granted to make the benefit of the patented invention available at reasonably affordable prices to the public".

To fulfil such an object, Section 146 of the abovementioned Act specifies that a periodical statement as to the extent to which the patented invention has been worked on a commercial scale in India has to be submitted by every patentee as well as licensee. The Controller has the power under

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from