Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2026

CASTLE TO QUEUE: How The 2026 IBC Amendment Dethrones Land Authorities In The Insolvency Waterfall

AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners
Contributor
AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners, one of India’s premier law firms was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to...

View firm profile
Explore more from AZB & Partners

The 2026 Amendment to India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has fundamentally altered the status of statutory land authorities in insolvency proceedings, stripping them of their claimed secured creditor status.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This article is originally published in ET legal world at 2026 Amendment to IBC: Land Authorities Lose Secured Creditor Status, ETLegalWorld.

Few stakeholders in the Indian insolvency ecosystem have fought as tenaciously or as creatively as statutory land authorities. Industrial development authorities, from Noida and Greater Noida (“GNIDA”) to their counterparts across Uttar Pradesh and beyond, have long claimed that statutory charges under land development legislation elevate them to the status of secured creditors in insolvency proceedings, entitling them to priority over banks, financial institutions, and all other creditors. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026 (“2026 Amendment”), enacted on April 6, 2026, has now pulled the rug from under their feet by amending the very definition of “security interest” under Section 3(31) and inserting an unambiguous Explanation into Section 53(1)(e)(i) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC” or “Code”). This

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from