Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2020

A Welfare State Is For The People And Cannot Derogate The Rights Of Its Citizens

The Judgment provided the protection to citizens from State adversely taking the possession of the property of a citizen.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector

The recent Supreme Court Judgment in case of Vidya Devi Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors, Civil Appeal nos. 6061 OF 2020, has restored the faith of the Indian Citizen in the Judiciary as a saviour of human rights, where the State Government was trying to derogate the rights of the citizens. The Supreme Court laid down an important principle that, a Welfare State cannot take the benefit arising out of the Doctrine of Adverse Possession.

The Judgment provided the protection to citizens from State adversely taking the possession of the property of a citizen. The court stated that forcibly taking possession of a person's private property is a violation of fundamentals of human rights and also Article 300A of the Constitution of India. It also stated that the State cannot invoke the benefits of the Doctrine of Adverse Possession and claim the title over such a forcibly acquired property without paying any compensation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from