On September 9, 2024, the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi
("NCLAT") in the case of, Sandeep
Mittal v. M/s ASREC (India) Limited, Company Appeal (AT)
(Insolvency) Nos. 37 & 573 of 2024, has held that sale
consideration payable towards purchase of assets does not qualify
as a 'financial debt' within the meaning of Section 5(8) of
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
("Code").
Brief Facts
In the instant case, Gujarat State Financial Corporation
("GSFC"), Gujarat Industrial Investment
Corporation ("GIIC"), Bank of Baroda and
Dena Bank (collectively, "GPPL Lenders")
had extended certain term loans to Ganpati Pulp and Paper Limited
("GPPL"), which were secured by a charge
created by GPPL over certain immovable assets. On default by GPPL,
GSFC took possession of the secured assets and issued a sale notice
pursuant to Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act,
1951. In response to the sale notice, an offer was submitted