Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2019

Payment Of Gratuity

The Supreme Court examined the issue of payment of gratuity to an Assistant Professor in the matter of Birla Institute of Education vs. State of Jharkhand

IndiaEmployment and HR

The Supreme Court examined the issue of payment of gratuity to an Assistant Professor in the matter of Birla Institute of Education vs. State of Jharkhand1. In order to determine this issue, the Apex Court relied on the matter of Ahmadabad Pvt. Primary Teachers Association vs. Administrative Officer and Others2 , where the question that came up for consideration was whether a 'Teacher' could be regarded as an "employee" under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 ("the Act"), and, if so, whether a teacher could be entitled to claim gratuity from his/her employer in accordance with the provisions of the Act. It was held that – "a teacher is not an employee, as defined under Section 2(e) of the Act, and hence, he/she is not entitled to claim any gratuity amount from his employer under the Act".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from