Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2025

Forgive The Wrongdoer But Do Not Forget The Wrongdoing: Supreme Court

S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Contributor
S.S. Rana & Co.

S.S. Rana & Co.

Established in 1989, S.S. Rana & Co. is a premier intellectual property and corporate law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from S.S. Rana & Co.

In a usual turn of events, the Supreme Court recently in a case of sexual harassment, V.P. v. N. K.C. & Ors, (Abbreviations used for maintaining confidentiality) pronounced an unusual punishment for the Vice-chancellor (hereinafter referred to as the "Respondent") of a renowned University.

IndiaEmployment and HR

Introduction

In a usual turn of events, the Supreme Court recently in a case of sexual harassment, V.P. v. N. K.C. & Ors,1 (Abbreviations used for maintaining confidentiality) pronounced an unusual punishment for the Vice-chancellor (hereinafter referred to as the "Respondent") of a renowned University. While dismissing the appeal, the bench comprising of Hon'ble Justices Mr. Pankaj Mithal and Mr. Prasanna B. Varale, ordered the judgement recording be made part of the resume of the Respondent.

What led to the filing of the present appeal?

Filing of the complaint of sexual harassment

The Appellant, a faculty member of the University, filed a complaint of sexual harassment against the Respondent with the Local Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "LC") on December 26, 2023. The LC rejected the complaint as time-barred since the last incident of sexual harassment had occurred in April 2023 while the complaint was submitted in December 2023 which was not

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from