The Supreme Court of India upholds disciplinary removal,
clarifies need for engagement with employee representations but
with limited high court intervention
In the State of Rajasthan and Ors vs. Bhupendra
Singh,1 on August 8, 2024, the
Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") upheld the
removal of an employee from service, clarifying that once the
disciplinary authority accepts the findings of an inquiry officer,
it need not provide elaborate reasons for the punishment. The
Supreme Court emphasised that while disciplinary authorities should
address employee representations when imposing major penalties,
High Courts should only intervene in disciplinary decisions if the
findings are based on no evidence or are clearly perverse. The
Supreme Court found that the Rajasthan High Court's decision to
overturn the removal order was unsustainable, as it improperly
reappraised evidence. Consequently, the Supreme Court restored the
removal order but ruled that the employee's