Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2021

Quoting Identical Prices In Tender Not Itself A Conclusive Proof Of Bid Rigging

Legacy Law Offices
Legacy Law Offices
Contributor
Legacy Law Offices

Legacy Law Offices

Legacy Law Offices LLP is a professionally managed full-service Indian law firm with a global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Legacy Law Offices

In respect of an open tender for surgical tapes dated 26.05.2016 invited by AIIMS, the CCI on a letter received by it dated 26.05.2016 from the Assistant Store Officer of AIIMS, took suo moto cognizance ...

IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law

Introduction

In respect of an open tender for surgical tapes dated 26.05.2016 invited by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) (hereinafter, referred as the "Tender"), the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on a letter received by it dated 26.05.2016 from the Assistant Store Officer of AIIMS, took suo moto cognizance on the allegation of cartelization between two of the thirteen bidders of the Tender, namely, Romsons Scientific & Surgical Industrial Private Limited (hereinafter, referred as "Romsons") and BSN Medical Private Limited, now Essity India Private Limited (hereinafter, referred as "BSN" or "Essity").

It was noted by the CCI that both the bidders had quoted identical prices up to the last two decimal places for 4 out of the 8 items mentioned in the Tender. The CCI further observed that it was highly improbable for the two bidders to quote identical rates as the two bidders were operating in different regions, (Romsons was based in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from