Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Malta vs Lithuania On The Road To MiCA

WH Partners
WH Partners
Contributor
WH Partners

WH Partners

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy. We have...

View firm profile
Explore more from WH Partners

Recently, Lithuania tightened its regulations pertaining to businesses that deal in cryptocurrency assets. To address issues like money laundering and fraud within the cryptocurrency sector...

GlobalTechnology

For Crypto Asset Service Providers ("CASP"s) operating in Europe, selecting a jurisdiction in which to base themselves is a crucial decision that they have to take in the immediate future. Malta and Lithuania are two popular jurisdictions that are attracting a lot of attention.

Lithuania's Stricter Approach to Regulation

Recently, Lithuania tightened its regulations pertaining to businesses that deal in cryptocurrency assets. To address issues like money laundering and fraud within the cryptocurrency sector, the Bank of Lithuania and the Ministry of Finance, among other Lithuanian authorities, have stressed the need for stronger laws. This regulatory tightening comes after Lithuania saw a sharp rise in the number of crypto-asset businesses, from 9 at the end of 2020 to 850 by the end of 2022, mostly due to its lax oversight of the industry players.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from