Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 FEBRUARY 2026

When Does Time Stop? Singapore's Approach To Foreign Award Enforcement And Its Relevance For India

Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Contributor
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners

Hammurabi & Solomon Partners

With over 100 members in India, Hammurabi & Solomon Partners (H&SP) is the pioneer in the realm of...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hammurabi & Solomon Partners

In a significant decision underscoring the pro-arbitration stance of Singapore's judiciary, the Singapore High Court recently addressed key challenges...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction:

In a significant decision underscoring the pro-arbitration stance of Singapore's judiciary, the Singapore High Court recently addressed key challenges to the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award in the case of South of England Protection and Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Ltd. (in liquidation) v. Pacmar Shipping Pte. Ltd. The finality and enforceability of arbitral awards are the twin pillars of international commercial arbitration. For these pillars to remain stable, legal systems must provide clear, predictable timelines within which an award creditor can seek the assistance of the state to realize the fruits of their litigation. In Singapore, this is governed by the Limitation Act 1959, which seeks to strike a balance between the rights of the creditor and the need to protect debtors from stale claims. The recent judgment in SEPIA vs. Pacmar Shipping case supraprovides a definitive clarification on when the clock stops for the purposes of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from