Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2025

Vasarely v. United States: Rule 41(g) Relief Denied In MLAT-Based Search

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

For those with an international enforcement practice, a federal district court recently ruled on whether a party subject to an MLAT-driven...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

For those with an international enforcement practice, a federal district court recently ruled on whether a party subject to an MLAT-driven search of her premises can obtain relief under Rule 41(g), and in doing so has provided a reminder regarding the challenges in obtaining Rule 41(g) relief when the search occurs pursuant to an MLAT.

In Vasarely v. United States, Michelle Vasarely ("Mrs. Vasarely"), daughter-in-law of renowned artist Victor Vasarely, became involved in a decades-long family dispute over the ownership of Victor's artworks. After serving as Chairperson of the Vasarely Foundation, Mrs. Vasarely received a substantial number of paintings through a 1995 arbitral award. French authorities later alleged that the arbitration was a sham that she orchestrated to benefit herself and other heirs, and they initiated a criminal investigation against her. In May 2023, pursuant to a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) between France and the United States, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from