Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

The Guide To Dispute Resolution In Africa 2025

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Welcome to the fourth edition (2025) of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer's Guide to Dispute Resolution in Africa. We are delighted to present this updated publication, which continues to offer a comprehensive overview...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Andrew Cannon
Andrew Cannon
Jonathan Ripley-Evans
Jonathan Ripley-Evans
Laurence Franc-Menget
Laurence Franc-Menget
Craig Tevendale
Craig Tevendale
Thierry Tomasi
Thierry Tomasi
Martin Kavanagh
Martin Kavanagh
Nina Bowyer
Nina Bowyer
Clément Dupoirier
Clément Dupoirier
Author LinkedIn connections

Welcome to the fourth edition (2025) of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer's Guide to Dispute Resolution in Africa. We are delighted to present this updated publication, which continues to offer a comprehensive overview of dispute resolution frameworks and trends across all 54 African jurisdictions. This guide remains unmatched in its breadth and depth, serving as an essential resource for clients navigating the continent's dynamic legal landscape.

Since the release of our previous editions in 2013, 2016, and 2022, this Guide has become a trusted resource for clients navigating Africa's diverse and evolving legal landscape. Whether facing disputes or exploring investment opportunities, our Guide serves as a first port of call for understanding the legal and regulatory terrain in unfamiliar jurisdictions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

End Of Concurrent Jurisdiction: Understanding The New Jurisdictional Boundaries In The Gauteng Division Of The High Court Of South Africa

A significant jurisdictional change has taken effect in South Africa's Gauteng Division of the High Court, ending the concurrent jurisdiction between Johannesburg and Pretoria seats that existed since 2018. Each seat now has defined geographical boundaries based on magisterial districts, requiring practitioners to carefully determine proper jurisdiction when instituting proceedings.
South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ENS
ENS
Article

Ghost Authorities: AI Hallucinations In The Courtroom

A South African Labour Court has stayed disciplinary proceedings after discovering that the chairperson's ruling relied on AI-generated, fictitious case citations. The judgment examines whether blind reliance on artificial intelligence tools constitutes a failure to apply independent legal reasoning, and what consequences flow from submitting fabricated authorities to courts and tribunals.
South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ENS
ENS
Article

Rescission Refused: Negligence Is Not Good Cause Under Rule 42(1)(a) Or The Common Law

The Supreme Court of Appeal examines whether a pension fund can successfully rescind a default judgment when its absence from proceedings resulted from internal administrative failures. The case explores the boundaries between procedural error and voluntary default, testing whether gross negligence in responding to legal process can be excused by the strength of a potential defence.
South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ENS
ENS
Article

No Easy Escape From Gauteng’s Mandatory Mediation Regime

A recent Gauteng High Court judgment confirms that mandatory court-annexed mediation cannot be avoided simply because parties are hostile toward each other or believe the process will be futile. The court ordered an uncooperative defendant to participate in mediation, establishing that only exceptional circumstances will excuse parties from the process introduced by the Directive and Protocol.
South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr