Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2026

Seat Matters: Challenging A Tribunal’s Ruling On Jurisdiction

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

Section 16 of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the “ACA”) codifies the Kompetenz-Kompetenz.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Kompetenz-Kompetenz is the universally accepted principle that empowers arbitration tribunals to decide on their own jurisdiction. However, recent decisions in the Indian Supreme Court and the Singapore High Court provide timely reminders on whether and when such jurisdictional rulings can be referred to the local supervisory court. Parties must remember the inconsistency across jurisdictions in timings its challenge to the Tribunal’s ruling on jurisdiction.

India

Section 16 of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the “ACA”) codifies the Kompetenz-Kompetenz. Section 16(5) provides that if a tribunal dismised a jurisdictional challenge then it shall continue with the arbitral proceedings and make an award. Relatedly, section 16(6) provides that a party aggrieved by such a ruling “may make an application for setting aside such an arbitral award in accordance with section 34” of the ACA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from